ShareThis Page

The war on 'gouging': Blame-shifters

| Monday, March 12, 2007

Democrat U.S. Reps. Jason Altmire of McCandless and Mike Doyle of Forest Hills are among 79 sponsors of the "Federal Price Gouging Prevention Act."

The bill's mission is to prevent evil energy companies from taking advantage of consumers by "gouging" them on the price of gasoline, natural gas and the like.

Judging from the amount of "gas-guzzling" traffic on the highways, consumers are rather inclined to do business with the devil. But the church of central planning will save them.

The dangerous economic illiteracy of the public and public officials is the touchstone of this anti-gouging initiative. Call the measure what you want but it's a form of price control. Such controls discourage energy companies from investing in production and distribution.

What are Reps. Altmire, Doyle and 77 other House members who signed the bill worried about•

The price of gasoline adjusted for inflation is less than in the 1920s; in the 1990s the price had fallen to around $1.50 in current dollars, according to the Ayn Rand Institute.

The war in the Middle East, government imposition of heavy regulation costs, official opposition to new refineries, energy taxes and the demand of emerging economies for petroleum are responsible for higher prices. It's amazing they aren't higher.

The bulk of that is government action. How dare Reps. Altmire, Doyle and their allies try to deflect the blame.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me