ShareThis Page
News

The Thursday wrap

| Thursday, April 26, 2007

Rosie's judgment: Liberal actress/talk-show host/provocateur Rosie O'Donnell took great pride in letting the expletives fly during Monday's Matrix Awards in New York, which honor media's most accomplished women. But she certainly was no exemplar of "accomplished," dropping foul-mouthed diatribes and grabbing herself. And she certainly was no role model for 17 high school girls there to pick up their media scholarships. What an embarrassment.

The "ic" factor: We sometimes have been taken to task on this page for dropping the "ic" from "Democratic" when referring to members of that party. And we've come across a wonderful supporting rationale from Shannon Flaherty, the spokeswoman for former Republican House Majority Leader Tom DeLay. Both visited the Trib on Monday: "(Democrats') attempts to adjective-ize their identity is another way to fool people into associating democratic principles with the modern Democrat Party," Ms. Flaherty told Roll Call in January. Ah, sanity.

Don't look now but ... : Carl Bernstein is due out with a book on Hillary Clinton in June. And a spokesman for publishing house Alfred A. Knopf says it "reaches conclusions that stand in opposition to what Hillary Clinton has said and written about herself." Well, at least this time she can't blame the vast right-wing conspiracy.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me