ShareThis Page

Liberal 'equity'

| Tuesday, Aug. 28, 2007

Congress returns to session next week. High on the agenda will be Democrat efforts to restore "equity" to the tax bite. And they'll open the debate with the usual canard: The Bush tax cuts favored the rich; it's time for middle-class tax relief.

But as The Wall Street Journal reports, "the richest 1 percent, 5 percent and 10 percent of the taxpayers are shouldering a larger burden of the income tax burden at the federal level than the tax estimators said they would had the tax cuts never materialized."

In real numbers, The Journal cites 2005 Treasury Department data: "The amount of tax paid by those earning more than $1 million a year increased to $236 billion in 2005, up from $132 billion in 2003, the year of the tax cut."

And for the liberal class-envy crowd, there's this: The top 1 percent of income earners who paid 19 percent of federal income taxes in 1980 paid 36 percent of all federal income taxes in 2004, The Journal notes. For the top 5 percent, the federal income tax share rose from 37 percent to 56 percent. For the top 10 percent, it went from 49 percent to 68 percent.

What's actually happened is a classic textbook tutorial. As tax rates fall, business activity increases, producing more tax revenues for government coffers.

Democrat "equity" will only raise tax rates, reduce business activity and produce less tax revenue. And that, class, is a lesson in liberal "progressivism."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me