ShareThis Page

The Chinese threat: More evidence

| Wednesday, Feb. 13, 2008

Ah, those Chinese. What a well-rounded and cunning adversary they are.

First they poisoned our pets with tainted food. Then they went after our babies with date-rape chemicals on toys. And now they've again been caught stealing our national secrets.

The feds arrested four people on Monday in two separate espionage cases. Among them:

• Charged with selling secrets to foreign agents is Greg William Bergersen, 51, of Alexandria, Va. The one-time director of the Navy's command, control, communications and intelligence office held a top-secret clearance. He most recently was a weapons system analyst for the Defense Security Cooperation Agency. But in his old post, he may have had access to this nation's most secret war-fighting data.

• Former Rockwell International and Boeing engineer Dongfan "Greg" Chung, 72, of Orange, Calif., is accused, in part, of supplying proprietary information to China on U.S. military aircraft and even the space shuttle.

Of course, Chinese spies are a lot like roaches -- there aren't only one or two. And these aren't the only operations the Chinese have going on in the world. As Newsmax's Joachim Bamrud detailed in Sunday's Trib, the Chinese have been expanding their economic and political influence in Latin America.

Some have hinted at it but we'll say it: The moves are a direct threat to U.S. national security. And it's a threat that could make the Islamofascists look like pikers.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me