ShareThis Page
College

Pitt's Wannstedt singles out offensive line

Kevin Gorman
| Tuesday, Sept. 25, 2007

Pitt coach Dave Wannstedt labeled the offensive line play "inconsistent" and called it one of the Panthers' two problem areas, along with quarterback.

"We should be better, we expect to be better, we have to be better," he said, "if we're going to improve as an offense."

• Wannstedt said sophomore right tackle Jason Pinkston (shoulder) is "not 100 percent healthy," meaning fifth-year senior Mike McGlynn is likely to start at right tackle for the second consecutive game. Wannstedt said sophomore Joe Thomas "has struggled" at right guard, so redshirt sophomore tackle John Bachman could see time there.

• Pitt had a delay of game on a kickoff after a television timeout in the fourth quarter that necessitated a call the Big East Conference offices for an explanation.

"I guess, after a TV timeout, they did tell the kicker (Cody Sawhill), 'You've got 25 seconds to kick the ball' once they handed it to him," Wannstedt said. "There was no whistle blown, so he was standing there holding the ball, waiting for the whistle and time expired."

• Receiver Oderick Turner was flagged on successive plays, first for an illegal shift, then a false start, early in the first quarter.

"The one there was no excuse for, and he'll be the first to tell you," Wannstedt said. "The other one, it was late in the huddle being called. He didn't hear it. He was asking (quarterback) Kevan (Smith), 'Give it to me again' and he ran to the line of scrimmage and as he was lining up they snapped the ball. It really wasn't his fault. It was a communication thing between those two."


Digits

8 - Penalties committed by Pitt against Connecticut, totaling 57 yards.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me