ShareThis Page

Pitt senior Dixon takes court against IU

| Wednesday, Dec. 9, 2009

NEW YORK — Pitt senior guard Jermaine Dixon, who has missed the first eight games, saw his first action of the season. Dixon, the team's lone returning starter, entered the game with 15:20 to play in the first half, replacing sophomore starter Ashton Gibbs at shooting guard. Dixon, wearing new uniform number 24, suffered a broken right foot in mid-September.

» Former Pitt football star Darrelle Revis, a Pro Bowl cornerback with the New York Jets, was among the ex-Panthers expected to attend the Pitt-Indiana game at Madison Square Garden. Revis was a two-sport standout at Aliquippa and worked out with the Panthers' basketball team for a couple of weeks in 2004-05 before deciding to focus solely on football. Manhattan coach Barry Rohrssen, a former Pitt assistant, and former Jets running back Curtis Martin, who played at Pitt, also were in attendance.

» Pitt coach Jamie Dixon had some ties to the opening game of the doubleheader, which saw Georgetown defeat Butler, 72-65. Dixon coached two of Butler's starters, sophomores Gordon Hayward and Shelvin Mack, for the gold medal-winning 2009 USA Basketball uU19 team. Ashton Gibbs also played for the USA's first U19 world champion in 18 years.

» Pitt entered the game 1-0 in the Jimmy V Classic, defeating Memphis in 2004 at Madison Square Garden.

» This is one of three trips to Madison Square Garden for Pitt this season. The Panthers will also meet St. John's on Feb. 27 and return for the Big East Tournament March 9.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me