ShareThis Page
College

Notebook: Bluemling gets start

| Monday, Jan. 10, 2005

Duquesne senior guard Tyler Bluemling made his second career start Saturday in place of Chauncey Duke, who was battling a stomach flu. Bluemling tied his career high with five assists in the Dukes' loss to No. 24 George Washington at Palumbo Center. Duke scored two points in 15 minutes off the bench. Meanwhile, Duquesne junior guard Jack Higgins, who has been sidelined with pneumonia, returned to the team but sat on the Dukes bench in street clothes. He is doubtful for the Dukes' game Wednesday night at Xavier.

  • Duquesne's 18 turnovers led to 15 George Washington points. The Colonials committed just 12. They also threw down six of their nine dunks before halftime.

  • Junior guard Bryant McAllister (12), sophomore center Kieron Achara (8) and freshman forward DeVario Hudson (6) scored all of Duquesne's 26 second-half points.

  • Duquesne managed to cut the George Washington lead to 15, at 61-46, with 8:17 left before the Colonials answered with an 18-6 run to erase any Duquesne comeback hopes. George Washington's balanced attack was fueled by Carl Elliott's game-high 11 assists, as the Colonials assisted on 26 of 30 field goals overall.

    "It is so tough to simulate a team with their talent in practice," Duquesne coach Danny Nee said. "Our young players can learn a lot from a game like this."

    Digits


    16 Consecutive Duquesne losses against nationally ranked teams.

    4 Current nationally ranked teams Duquesne has lost to this season.

  • TribLIVE commenting policy

    You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

    We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

    While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

    We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

    We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

    We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

    We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

    We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

    click me