ShareThis Page
Home

WCCC loses first-round game

| Sunday, May 22, 2005

Gloucester (N.J.) County Community College demonstrated why its the No. 1-ranked junior college baseball team in the nation.

Gloucester turned six errors into six unearned runs in an 8-2 victory over Westmoreland County Community College in the opening round of the Junior College World Series Saturday at Glens Falls, N.Y.

Westmoreland County Community College returns to action noon today against an opponent to be determined in the eight-team, double-elimination series.

"I think we played scared - like we were playing not to lose instead of playing to win," WCCC manager Mike Draghi said.

Left-handed winning pitcher Michael Antonini (10-0) kept Westmoreland off balance throughout the game with his fastball and change-up.

Draghi gave credit to his losing pitcher Justin Dickert (8-4), a freshman righthander.

"Justin pitched a solid game, but you just can't give a team like Gloucester six or seven additional outs," Draghi said. "It's a 2-2 game if we play solid defense."

Gloucester slugger Tim Edmeads took advantage of his extra trips to the plate to belt a two-run homer, two singles and a double. He also reached base twice on walks.

WCCC scored single runs in the first and sixth innings on RBI singles by David Campbell and Shawn Schwarz.

Draghi held a meeting with his team after the game.

"I reminded them that with our fall and spring schedules, we've won over 50 games and won a regional championship," Draghi said. "We've played some very good teams and whenever we've lost, we've bounced back the next game. We need to be ready to play when we go out there tomorrow."

Matt Roach, a freshman lefthander from Hempfield, is expected to start today's game for WCCC.

Westmoreland County Community College is representing Region 20 (Pennsylvania, Maryland, West Virginia and the District of Columbia) in the tournament.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me