ShareThis Page

High-ranked West Virginia back to work

| Sunday, Aug. 6, 2006

MORGANTOWN, W.Va. - With five games on national television and its top-10 preseason rankings splashed across newsstands, All-American center Dan Mozes agrees West Virginia won't sneak up on any teams this season.

It's more likely they'll run over them.

"Everybody is going to be shooting for us this year, but at the same time we're going to be shooting for everybody else," Mozes said Saturday after the Mountaineers opened fall practice at Milan Puskar Stadium.

"We're going to take the same approach we took last year," he said.

West Virginia was supposed to be rebuilding last season but finished 11-1 and ranked No. 5 in the final Associated Press poll. The Mountaineers silenced most Big East Conference critics with a breakthrough, 38-35 victory over Georgia in the Sugar Bowl.

Despite leg-cramping temperatures, West Virginia went back to work with 51 returning lettermen, including 15 starters, from a team that led the Big East in rushing.

Nine starters return on offense, led by the conference's most explosive running backfield of quarterback Patrick White, tailback Steve Slaton and bulldozing 245-pound fullback Owen Schmitt.

"You have to let the rankings and expectations go in one ear and out the other," Mozes said. "We only lost one game last season, so we'll think of ourselves as underdogs again. We like that role."

Mountaineers coach Rich Rodriguez enters his sixth season with a 39-22 record while coming off his first outright Big East title. He led the Mountaineers to at least a share of the last three Big East titles.

"I don't know where we're picked this year, but if we're picked first, I hope they're right," Rodriguez said at the Big East media day.

Rodriguez said it was hard to predict anything based on yesterday's first practice.

"It was a typical opening practice," he said. "I thought the effort was pretty good. The execution was awful. We're not ready to play a game, but nobody is at this point. It's a starting point."

Rodriguez said he had no argument either way with the coaches who ranked the Mountaineers No. 7 in the USA Today/Coaches preseason poll.

"The biggest thing about being ranked in the top 10 or 12 is you're already up there to begin with and you almost have to play your way out," he said. "It doesn't really matter."

Rodriguez said success won't change his approach to practice.

"We'll approach it the same way, coach 'em the same way, practice the same way, and just hope we stay lucky and healthy and maybe win a few games," he said.

The key, he said, is keeping players focused on the next play, not some make-or-break game like the Mountaineers' visit to Louisville on Nov. 2.

"You get looking too far down the road, that's a recipe for disaster," Rodriguez said. "Just worry about the next play. And at the end of 12 games of worrying about the next play, let's see where we are."

Asked if Louisville will be his toughest game this season, Rodriguez smiled.

"Our toughest game will be Marshall Sept. 2," he said. "After that, it will be, who's next?"

The Mountaineers host Eastern Washington on Sept. 9.


• Former Gateway quarterback Mortty Ivy, a sophomore linebacker, should be able to resume practice this month, Rodriguez said. Ivy tore knee ligaments in spring practice but has come back faster than expected.

• Rodriguez said he's considering moving Blackhawk's Jeremy Bruce from slot receiver to tailback to provide depth. "Jeremy is a good player and we've got to find another guy who can play tailback in the next two weeks," Rodriguez said.

Additional Information:


Preseason hype

The Mountaineers opened fall practice Saturday ranked among the nation's top 10 in a host of preseason college football magazine, Internet and major polls.

WVU ranking-Poll

2-Street & Smith's


5-The Sporting News


7-USA Today/Coaches

The Associated Press Top 25 preseason poll will be released Aug. 19.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me