ShareThis Page
WVU

WVU notebook

| Wednesday, Dec. 27, 2006

Gator Bowl ticket sales have surpassed last season, when just more than 60,000 fans watched Virginia Tech defeat Louisville, 35-24. The CBS-televised game between West Virginia and Georgia Tech on Monday is just a few thousand short of a sellout of 73,000 tickets, bowl president Rick Catlett told the Florida Times-Union. He said both teams received an allotment of 12,750 tickets, and West Virginia officials have requested 3,000 more tickets. Georgia Tech, which is coming off a two-game losing streak to Georgia and Wake Forest, did not request additional tickets so far, Catlett said in the report. Ticket information is available at www.gatorbowl.com .

• Defensive tackle Craig Wilson (ankle) and wide receiver Rayshawn Bolden are questionable for Monday's game, WVU coach Rich Rodriguez said. Running back Steve Slaton (thigh bruise), quarterback Pat White (high ankle sprain) and fullback Owen Schmitt (high ankle sprain) are expected to play.

• Defensive end Johnny Dingle and backup wide receiver Dwayne Thompson missed Tuesday's practice after their flight from Miami was cancelled due to high winds. Both players are due on the field today.

• Georgia Tech players arrived yesterday and will hold their first on-site practice today at Jacksonville University.


Digits

2-0 - Georgia Tech's lead in the all-time series, including a 35-30 victory over West Virginia in the 1997 Carquest Bowl and a 42-19 win in the 1954 Sugar Bowl.

- By Rick Starr

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me