ShareThis Page
Home

Gannon, Mercyhurst join PSAC

| Thursday, June 28, 2007

In a groundbreaking move for the Pennsylvania State Athletic Conference, the league announced Wednesday that Gannon University and Mercyhurst College have become the first privately owned conference members, increasing the number of full members to 16.

The two schools, located three miles apart in Erie, will begin their new association in 2008-09 after remaining with the Michigan-based Great Lakes Intercollegiate Athletic Conference for one year.

They each will be required to pay the GLIAC a $50,000 fee for waiving a two-year notice rule.

"There is no question that today is a historic day for the (PSAC)," conference commissioner Steve Murray said. "We did not have to look very far to find a pair of schools that would fit in well with our current members."

The PSAC, whose original members are state-owned institutions within the Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education, is the largest NCAA Division II conference with all of its full-time members located in the same state.

Prior to the new additions, the PSAC's 14 full members included schools such as California, Clarion, Edinboro, Indiana, Lock Haven, Shippensburg and Slippery Rock.

The PSAC last week also extended an invitation to Long Island University-C.W. Post to join the league as an associate member in football and field hockey and has given the New York school a Monday deadline to respond.

Murray said the league is about to reinforce its standing among the nation's Division II conferences by increasing the number of scholarships a school can offer. In the past, the PSAC has lagged behind other conferences such as the GLIAC.

Subsequent to the PSAC's proposed expansion, the league's board of directors voted to amend annual scholarship polices, allowing an increase of 45 athletics equivalencies to 125 for each of its members.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me