ShareThis Page
Sports

Nittany Lions get another shot at No. 1

| Monday, Oct. 22, 2007

Penn State is playing a No. 1 Ohio State team for the second consecutive season Saturday, which might make these things seem like old hat for the Nittany Lions.

Not so.

Prior to the 2006 meeting with the top-ranked Buckeyes, the last time Penn State had played a No. 1 team was in 1998. The last time Penn State hosted No. 1 was 1989, when the Nittany Lions dropped a 34-23 decision to Notre Dame.

Penn State (6-2, 3-2), ranked 24th in the AP poll, has an opportunity to score a landmark victory for the program.

"I can't say that I know the exact history of the program, but it will be a big win for our team right here, 2007," wide receiver Jordan Norwood said. "Hopefully, we'll be able to get that done."

Penn State took a run at a No. 1 Buckeyes team last September in Columbus, leading 3-0 at the half and entering the fourth quarter down just 7-3. A couple of desperation passes by Anthony Morelli that were returned for touchdowns late made for a 28-6 final that didn't accurately reflect the competitiveness of the game.

In this, the year of the surprise in college football, it would be hard to rule out the possibility of a Nittany Lions win this weekend, especially playing in Beaver Stadium.

"We always feel that we can play with anybody at home," quarterbacks coach Jay Paterno said.

Penn State has won 19 of its past 20 home games.

Add in an 8 p.m. starting time and national television, and the elements are in place for a classic night.

"It's a great thing," cornerback Justin King said. "They're No. 1 coming in, a night game at the Beaver. It should be fun and exciting."

Penn State's confidence is buoyed by its recent play. The Nittany Lions won consecutive home games with Iowa and Wisconsin, the latter a 38-7 rout of the Badgers. Most recently, Penn State picked up its first road win of the season on Saturday, outlasting Indiana, 36-31.

"We've definitely got momentum," Morelli said. "The good thing is we play them at home, but we're going to have to have a tough week of practice. They're the best in the land. We've got to go out and execute and focus and play our game like we did (at Indiana)."

Penn State will have to play better. Indiana gave away the game, according to Penn State coach Joe Paterno, who alluded to four second-half Hoosiers fumbles and his Nittany Lions' settling for field goals instead of touchdowns after the turnovers.

Ohio State (8-0, 4-0) is coming off a 24-17 win over Michigan State in which the Buckeyes went on top, 24-0, and found themselves holding on at the end.

That Ohio State is No. 1 is a surprise. The good fortune of the Buckeyes could be good for the Nittany Lions, too, if they can find a way to defeat them.

That is a big if. Penn State's injuries are mounting. After losing defensive end/linebacker Jerome Hayes for the season two games ago, the Nittany Lions lost defensive tackle Jared Odrick (broken ankle) and fullback Matt Hahn (knee) for the season in the Indiana win.

Because of those injuries, the strength of Ohio State, and the Buckeyes' recent history against Penn State, which has won just one of the past five games in the series, the challenge is great,

"It's going to be a tough game," Lions defensive end Maurice Evans said. "It's going to be another dogfight."

Additional Information:

Against the best

Penn State's most recent games with No. 1 teams:

&#149 Sept. 23, 2006: No. 1 Ohio State 28, Penn State 6

&#149 Oct. 3, 1998: No. 1 Ohio State 28, Penn State 9

&#149 Nov. 17, 1990: Penn State 24, No. 1 Notre Dame 21

&#149 Nov. 18, 1989: No. 1 Notre Dame 34, Penn State 23

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me