ShareThis Page
Sports

Duquesne dominates Rice to open 3-0

| Sunday, Nov. 18, 2007

KATY, Texas -- Duquesne's effort in Saturday's game against Rice was far from perfect, but it didn't have to be.

The Dukes utilized a strong defensive performance and outstanding nights from centers Shawn James and Kieron Achara to knock off the Owls, 86-59, at Leonard E. Merrell Center.

The win gives Duquesne its first road win and pushes its record to 3-0. It also marked the Dukes' largest margin for a road win since a 87-58 defeat of Robert Morris on Dec. 22, 1994.

The Dukes have James (18 points, game-high tying four blocks) and Achara (game-high 19 points, five rebounds) to thank for it. The two big men controlled the paint and kept Rice (0-2) from establishing an inside presence.

"(Kieron) and Shawn did a great job in the second half," Duquesne coach Ron Everhart said. "I thought Shawn was very instrumental in helping us win the game tonight, and I thought Kieron was great offensively for us. (Kieron) cut and passed real well, got the ball inside, finished, and made his free throws for the most part."

James' and Achara's strong play seemed to carry over to their teammates, especially in the second half. The Dukes held Rice to a measly 32.1 shooting percentage from the field (20 percent from behind the arc) and forced the Owls into 28 turnovers (14 by steals), which were converted into 30 points.

Reserve forward Damion Sanders also played a key role in the Dukes' outstanding defensive performance. The freshman finished with 10 points, eight rebounds, four blocks, and four steals in 19 minutes.

Rice forward Paulius Packevicius did all he could to keep the Owls in the game. He finished with 18 points (7-of-10 shooting), 11 rebounds, two blocks and two steals, but it wasn't enough to keep Rice from falling flat on its face.

"He had a great game," Everhart said. "We just didn't do a very good job on him, but I tell you they got him posted up deep and they got him the ball in areas where he could score. Quite frankly, he manhandled us tonight."

Duquesne's superb defensive performance offset a poor night from the arc. The Dukes hit only 5 of 22 3-point attempts. Their first successful 3-pointer came when forward Bill Clark found the net with 19:01 left in the second half.

Rice, meantime, did not do itself any favors at the free-throw line, connecting on only 20 of 31 attempts.

The Dukes finished strong, but did not get off to a great start. Neither team did.

The two combined for 25 fouls and 26 turnovers in the first half. The Dukes missed all eight of their 3-pointers, but took a slim 32-30 lead into halftime.

"We knew we could have played better basketball in the first half," James said. "We were real passive and weren't aggressive. In the second half, we turned it up."

And did the Dukes ever turn it up. Duquesne shot a blistering 50 percent in the second period and forced 13 turnovers.

The Dukes opened the period on a 23-10 run to take a 55-40 lead, and never trailed from that point. Achara, who scored 13 of his 19 points in the second period, led the way.

The Dukes took their largest lead of the night, 86-58, when Kojo Mensah (12 points, five assists) converted a three-point play with 1:05 left.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me