ShareThis Page

Grading the Mountaineers

| Sunday, Oct. 12, 2008

West Virginia tailback Noel Devine rushed 92 yards for a touchdown with 4:16 remaining to make the Big East matchup a two-possession game and secure a 17-6 win for the Mountaineers on Saturday. Here's how the Mountaineers graded out:

Offense, D-

The offense almost flunked, but receives a few sympathy points because quarterback Pat White sat out with a concussion. The collapse of the offense isn't completely the players' fault, though. You have to wonder why tailback Noel Devine had only 18 carries despite averaging 10.4 yards per touch. And with junior quarterback Jarrett Brown making just his second career start, Devine could have taken some pressure off Brown way before his 92-yard, game-winning touchdown run with 4:16 remaining. Brown averaged 2.2 yards per carry and was sacked twice.

Defense, B

The defense improved after it allowed Syracuse to cap a 16-play, 81-yard drive with a field goal on its first possession. Safety Quinton Andrews led West Virginia with nine tackles and LB Mortty Ivy had eight. WVU allowed Syracuse to take 25 more snaps on offense. Syracuse RB Curtis Brinkley ran for 144 yards on 28 carries and QB Cam Dantley completed 24 of 40 passes for 204 yards. However, WVU's defense in the red zone and on fourth down was impressive. Syracuse scored just once in three visits to the red zone, and the Orange were 0 for 3 on fourth-down conversions.

Special Teams, B+

West Virginia didn't give up any big returns, but the Mountaineers didn't have any of their own either. West Virginia senior Pat McAfee's kicking made for the only highlights. That's been the case for most of the season. McAfee had a busy afternoon, as he averaged 47 yards on seven punts. He also converted a 33-yard field goal in the fourth quarter. West Virginia's special-teams play has improved since a subpar performance against Marshall, but the big plays are still missing.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me