ShareThis Page

IUP softball makes 1st World Series

| Sunday, May 22, 2011

Scoring in two of 14 innings usually isn't a recipe for success, but the Indiana (Pa.) softball team made it work.

Freshman third baseman Mary Ward's two-run homer in the top of the seventh inning Saturday earned IUP a 2-1 win over Bloomsburg at Podbielski Field — and a spot in its first Division II College World Series.

Following a Raquel Rugani single, Ward hit a 1-0 pitch over the center-field fence to give her team the lead. IUP pitcher Erin Holloway allowed one run and struck out four in a complete game. She set down Bloomsburg in order in the seventh for her 27th win of the season and 11th of the postseason, clinching the best-of-three series.

IUP scored all of its runs in the seventh inning to rally to a 3-2 victory in its first meeting with Bloomsburg on Friday night.

The Crimson Hawks (38-6) open World Series play against North Georgia, the Southeast Super Regional winner, on Thursday in Salem, Va.


Millersville 5, Seton Hill 3 — No. 1 seed Millersville used a three-run sixth inning to eliminate the third-seeded Griffins from the Division II Atlantic Region tournament.

Seton Hill scored all three of its runs in the first two innings behind two RBI by Nate Defilippi. Pitcher Brian Warheit allowed five runs and struck out five in 6 2/3 innings. Seton Hill (33-15) ended the season on a five-game losing streak.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me