ShareThis Page
News Columnists

Baseball should follow hockey's lead

| Sunday, Oct. 21, 2001

Today is Ichiro Suzuki's birthday. He is 28. Yet he is a first-year major league player and unless there is an unfair bias, the Seattle Mariners outfielder will win the American League Rookie-of-the-Year award. And he should...based on the rules.

A major league player qualifies as a rookie as long as he has not exceeded 130 at bats or 50 innings pitched in previous seasons. He also cannot have spent more than 45 days on a major league roster during the 25 player limit period.

But Ichiro played nine years in the Japanese league with the Orix Blue Wave and won his seventh straight batting title for them last year. He may not have 130 major league at bats, but he had 3,619 at bats in Japan. His lifetime average there is .353. Isn't it a bit of a knock against the Japanese league to not consider that experience as nothing more than the minor leagues•

Just as hockey did when it started getting so many foreign players with varied experience, baseball should change the rules for their Rookie-of-the-Year awards. When Calgary's Sergei Makarov won the Calder Trophy as NHL Rookie of the Year in 1990, he was almost 32 years old. The NHL immediately changed the qualifications. Players now cannot be older than 25 when the season starts in order to qualilfy for the Calder Trophy.

Baseball should consider some changes, too, although to me, the age of Ichiro doesn't bother me. That should be insignificant. It's his experience that should be taken into consideration.

  • So let me get this straight. The Pirates removed pitcher Rich Loiselle from their 40 man roster and sent him to their AAA Nashville farm team. But he refused the assignment and instead becomes a free agent. The same Rich Loiselle who had an earned run average of 11.50 last year• I hope he didn't let the door hit him in the butt on the way out of town.

  • I do not like five game series in the baseball playoffs. In a sport where it takes 25 guys playing 162 games to get there, a five game series places way too much emphasis on any one game and more importantly on only about 14 or 15 players. You have pitchers ready to start on only three days rest. You have starters working out of the bullpen. There will always be increased pressure during the postseason, but a five game series actually changes the way a manager uses his roster, and I hate it. Extending things two or three more days into October, during a normal season, won't hurt anything.

  • All of major league baseball should be concerned by the television ratings of a week ago tonight. The New York Yankees and Oakland A's played a fifth and deciding playoff game. It was a close game involving teams from the biggest TV market in the country and from the west coast.

    At the same time, the Monday Night game on ABC featured Dallas and Washington. Both teams were 0-4 and both played lousy football. One touchdown was scored all night. Yet the football game did better in the national ratings than the baseball game did.

    There has been little doubt for a long time that football is the sport of choice for most Americans. Baseball is only dreaming when it still considers itself the national pastime. But this really proves the point.

  • Ivan Hlinka was hired to coach the Penguins last year for one main reason. To appease the whiny and uncoachable Jaromir Jagr. The two worked together successfully when the Czechs won the gold medal at the 1998 Olympics. With so many European players in general and Czech players in particular, it seemed like a good idea. But sometimes two and two just doesn't come out to four. Jagr may have won another scoring title but was more moody than usual and that is saying something. Plus, he really wasn't piling up the big numbers until the return of Mario Lemieux in late December. So the Hlinka-Jagr connection didn't work.

    There were other problems with Hlinka. His insistence on keeping a short bench, using mostly veterans over and over again while retarding the progress of the young turks in the organization, was poor strategy.

    He refused to match lines for much of the season. With all of the offensive talent the Penguins had, he often got away with it. But in the playoffs it really bit him especially in the New Jersey series. The Devils were probably a better team anyway, but the Pens never had a chance to find out how good they could have been. Not with Bobby Holik bottling up Mario even in the games played at Mellon Arena. It was hard to tell if this was stubborness or stupidity, but it was bad whatever it was.

    But with the Penguins making it to the conference finals, it was almost impossible to fire Hlinka after last season. Craig Patrick wasted little time in announcing that he would return. Then Jagr was traded in July and whether or not the two could patch things up was moot. It became a matter of when Hlinka would be fired, not if.

    It didn't help when training camp started and Hlinka's poor English didn't seem to have improved much from a year ago despite the organization's request for him to take some formal training. It's not smart to tick off Mario Lemieux if you want to continue collecting a paycheck from the Penguins.

    A lot of people last week were asking me if it was fair to can the guy after just four games. The 0-4 start wasn't the reason Hlinka was fired, it was just the excuse used to do something that seemed obviously necessary since last year.

  • TribLIVE commenting policy

    You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

    We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

    While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

    We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

    We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

    We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

    We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

    We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

    click me