ShareThis Page

Mayfair, Bryant and Perez earn spots in the British Open

| Monday, July 4, 2005

LEMONT, Ill. -- Billy Mayfair might be changing his plans for the next couple of weeks.

Mayfair's fourth-place finish at the Western Open on Sunday earned him an exemption for the British Open. Bart Bryant and Pat Perez also earned their way into golf's oldest championship, which will be played July 14-17 at the Old Course at St. Andrews in Scotland.

A final spot will be awarded after next week's John Deere Classic.

"I just was planning on playing next week at (John Deere), and if I do, I don't know if I can get over there in time and all that," said Mayfair, who shot a 3-under 68 and finished six strokes behind winner Jim Furyk. "So I've got to make a couple phone calls and make a couple quick decisions here.

"It's a good decision to have," he added. "It's a lot better than worrying about if I'm going to get in or not, that's for sure."

Players used to have to travel to Europe for qualifying tournaments, usually held the Monday before the British Open begins. But in an effort to give more players a chance to play their way in, there are now several qualifiers worldwide, as well as a special money list.

Using earnings from The Players Championship and the five most recent tournaments -- the Memorial, the Booz Allen Classic, the U.S. Open, the Barclays Classic and the Western -- the top two players who didn't already have exemptions qualified. Bryant ($990,000) began the week at the top of the list, but Mayfair wasn't even close.

His fourth-place finish Sunday earned him $240,000, though, and moved him into second place ($464,599) on the British money list. Bryant, who didn't play the Western, kept the top spot.

The third spot went to the top finisher at the Western not otherwise exempt: Perez. Perez actually finished in a tie with Brett Quigley, who also was looking for an exemption. Both shot 1-under 70s, but Perez had the lower third-round score.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me