ShareThis Page
High School Sports

Notebook: Mounties try to pick up the pieces

| Monday, Sept. 5, 2005

In the face of overwhelming evidence to a 6-0 shutout, Ligonier Valley did come away with a few positives in Friday's game against Northern Cambria.

But only a few.

Although Ligonier Valley out gained Northern Cambria 252 yards to 161 and had 10 more first downs than the Colts, the most glaring statistics were the Mounties' four turnovers and nine penalties.

"We pretty much shot ourselves in the foot," Ligonier Valley coach Roger Beitel said. "We were in a position to score several times, but we turned the ball over. We were hit with penalties all in crucial situations."

Ligonier Valley was in position to score several times Friday night, particularly in the first quarter.

On first and goal from the 12, Ligonier Valley quarterback Jon Cotchen rushed for an 11 yard gain, but a holding penalty and a personal foul set the Mounties back to the 26. Four plays later, Cotchen was intercepted by Mike Paronish.

After that drive, excluding the overtime period, Ligonier Valley failed to get inside the Northern Cambria 20.

The first game of the season for Ligonier Valley was as though last season never ended. Ligonier Valley finished the 2004 season last in the Heritage Conference in turnover differential (-17) and scoring offense (9.2 points per game).

Starting today, however, Beitel is enforcing an "us against the world" philosophy on his team, after the team has dropped its past nine games and 15 out of its past 20.

"The big thing is to pull our team together and regroup and concentrate (on Saltsburg)," Beitel said. "The game was very emotionally challenging. There's a game that could have been ours very easily, and we gave it away."

It's in the water

Just a few miles away, Laurel Valley, Ligonier Valley's sister school, is also left wondering after being handed a 33-12 loss to Blairsville -- its worst week one loss since 2002.

"We can learn from it and eliminate some of the mistakes we made," Laurel Valley coach Jerry Page said. "To beat a team like Blairsville, you need to have everything going right and we didn't have everything going right (Saturday)."

Laurel Valley limited its mistakes to very few with only one turnover and five penalties.

"With an inexperienced football team, that's always a concern," Page said. "Again, it's a first game against an outstanding football team, and now we move forward and see what happens."

For the second consecutive year, both schools have lost their respective openers.

Limited production

With only 29 offensive plays, Saltsburg coach Eric Kostic said he did the best he could do in Friday night's 7-6 loss to Purchase Line. Without senior quarterback Mike Speal completing a pass, Saltsburg managed only 89 yards, which was last in the conference after the first week.

"It doesn't give you much of an opportunity to do anything," he said. "(This week's game) really isn't about Ligonier Valley, it's about us. We need to improve, especially offensively."

Heritage Conference leaders

Here are the top statistical leaders from this weekend's games.


Adam Highberger, Blairsville 16-of-20, 207 yards, 2 TDs

Adam Gibson, Laurel Valley 7-of-15, 111 yards, 2 TDs

Sean Domer, United, 7-of-11, 100 yards, 2 TDs


Nick Stone, Blairsville, 18 carries, 145 yards, 2 TDs

Travis Clapsaddle, Purchase Line, 15 carries, 103 yards

Todd Smyers, Marion Center, 23 carries, 93 yards, 2 TDs


Andy Ostach, Blairsville, 6 catches, 105 yards, 1 TD

John Caruso, Homer-Center, 2 catches, 64 yards

Justin Shetler, Laurel Valley, 3 catches, 59 yards, 1 TD

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me