ShareThis Page
High School Sports

Matchup of the Week

| Thursday, Nov. 10, 2005

LAMONT SMITH VS. DERRON SMITH

About Lamont Smith (Central Catholic)

Smith is the leading rusher in the WPIAL with 1,960 yards, along with 21 touchdowns, and gained a career-high 312 and scored three TDs in last week's quarterfinal victory over Gateway. The 5-foot-9, 165-pound junior has game-breaking speed (he scored on a 92-yarder last week) and he's durable (254 carries this year).

About Derron Smith (Woodland Hills)

The 6-foot-1, 208-pound senior gets overshadowed playing alongside Pitt recruit Greg Webster, but he's a play-making defender in his own right. Smith has 4.65 speed in the 40-yard dash and is a ferocious hitter. His speed and pursuit ability will be a key against Central Catholic's Smith.

Advantage

Lamont Smith will have the advantage when No. 1 Central Catholic meets No. 5 Woodland Hills at 7:30 p.m. Friday at North Allegheny High School in the WPIAL Class AAAA semifinals. Smith has proven he can run against any defense, including 162 yards against Woodland Hills in their Week 7 meeting.

Last week

Woodland Hills senior linebacker Greg Webster won last week's matchup with Upper St. Clair junior quarterback Pat McShane. Webster recorded 11 tackles (nine solo), as the Wolverines beat Upper St. Clair, 28-15, in the WPIAL Class AAAA quarterfinals. McShane completed 11 of 17 passes for 60 yards in the Panthers' lowest scoring output of the season.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me