ShareThis Page

Mt. Pleasant secures solid victory

| Saturday, Sept. 4, 2010

Mt. Pleasant running back Bryce Ansell returned successfully from a torn ACL that ended his 2009 season, scoring two touchdowns Friday to lead the Vikings over Charleroi, 20-13. Ansell, the only returning starter for the defending Class AA Intertstate Conference champions, carried the ball 18 times for 126 yards to lead a potent Vikings' rushing attack.

He started slow, totaling only 9 yards on his first five carries.

As the game progressed, though, he began to resemble the player that rushed for more than 1,100 yards last season. The most critical of his carries was a 24-yard touchdown run, the only score of the second half.

Mt. Pleasant senior quarterback Nick Halfhill did most of his damage on the ground. He rushed for 65 yards, while junior running back Kevin Yanok added 38 yards.

Charleroi held a one point advantage at the half, but the Cougars lost two of their most dangerous offensive playmakers in running back Quentin Briggs and receiver Kyle Shannon. Both players suffered leg injuries, Briggs' coming just before halftime. Shannon, who put the Cougars on the board with a 44-yard reception in the first quarter, went down with his injury midway through the third quarter.

Despite the absence of two of his favorite weapons, Cougars quarterback Tommy Thorpe totaled 111 passing yards and 48 yards rushing but was not able to lead his team into the end zone in the second half.

Senior Cory Altemara filled in admirably for his injured teammates. The fullback rushed for 29 yards and added another 39 in receiving.

Mt. Pleasant returns home to host Yough next week, while Charleroi looks to rebound from this tough loss on the road against Brownsville.

Photo Galleries

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me