ShareThis Page
News

Aliquippa handles Washington

Doug Gulasy
| Saturday, Nov. 12, 2011

Top-seeded Aliquippa came into its WPIAL Class AA quarterfinal game with the goal of controlling the line of scrimmage.

The Quips succeeded, dominating No. 8 Washington's offense in a 36-6 victory at Chartiers Valley.

Aliquippa (11-0) cruised into the WPIAL semifinals for the fifth straight season. The Quips have made it to Heinz field three years in a row.

This time, Aliquippa did it with its swarming defense, holding the Prexies (8-3) and star running back Shai McKenzie to negative rushing yards.

"Defensively, we controlled the line of scrimmage against them," Aliquippa coach Mike Zmijanac said. "The whole tenor of the game changed, because we could do what we wanted to do and we weren't pressing to do anything."

It didn't take long for Aliquippa to assert its dominance. The Quips took the opening kickoff and marched 73 yards in 13 plays, aided by a crucial penalty on fourth down. Dravon Henry capped off the drive with a 27-yard rushing touchdown on fourth-and-3.

Their next two scores took considerably less time. After a Washington interception, it took Aliquippa just two plays to strike on a 45-yard pass from Mikal Hall to Kaylan Kenney. After a bad snap on a punt on the Prexies' ensuing possession, Mikal Hall found Davion Hall for a 29-yard score on the next play.

The two hooked up again from 38 yards later in the half.

The Quips will face No. 5 Greensburg Central Catholic in the semifinals.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me