ShareThis Page
High School Sports

Burrell avenges loss

| Thursday, Jan. 8, 2004

In a rematch of last season's WPIAL Class AA team championship match, Burrell's Jon Keller nailed a first-period pin and propelled the Bucs to a 42-30 win over defending champion Mt. Pleasant in Section 1-AA action at Burrell High School on Wednesday night.

In last year's AA championship, Keller got pinned in the third period of the final bout as Mt. Pleasant edged Burrell, 32-31.

"I remembered that match last year," said Keller, who pinned Ryan Bann in the 215-pound bout last night.

"That kept me motivated. I was confident. I know I worked hard all summer. I knew I had improved enough."

Keller's victory was an emotional boost for Burrell, which rolled to an 18-0 lead and then held off Mt. Pleasant in front of a large home crowd.

Burrell, ranked No. 1 in WPIAL Class AA by the Tribune-Review, improved to 6-0 in section competition and 6-1 overall.

The Bucs are the only undefeated team in Section 1-AA. They have three section contests left and can recapture the 1-AA title by winning out.

Last year, Burrell finished second to Mt. Pleasant in the section standings. Before that, the Bucs had won three consecutive section titles.

Mt. Pleasant slipped to 4-2 in the section.

Burrell coach Chris Como said the win over Mt. Pleasant was a morale booster as the Bucs continue to pursue their first WPIAL title since 1997.

"They are they returning WPIAL champs," Como said of Mt. Pleasant. "Regardless if they are down a little or they have guys out with injuries, you have to beat the champion to become the champ. That's how important this match was to us.

"We owed this team. They beat us by a combined score of five points in two matches last season."

Mt. Pleasant wrestled without one starter who is injured.

"They're very balanced," Mears said of Burrell. "They don't have two state qualifiers like they did last year, but they have a good kid at every weight. That makes them a good dual meet team."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me