ShareThis Page
Home

These Lemieux milestones are ones to pause and consider

| Sunday, Oct. 26, 2003

Run the words "Lemieux milestone" through an Internet search engine, and in roughly 0.23 seconds, you'll get approximately 2,200 results.

Career milestones are nothing new for Mario Lemieux. Penguins fans have watched him hit one after another over the years, most recently the 1,000th assist mark Feb. 8 against the Boston Bruins.

Going into Friday night's game against the New Jersey Devils, Lemieux was just three points shy of becoming the sixth player in NHL history to record 1,700 points. Of the five who've reached 1,700 points before him -- Wayne Gretzky, Marcel Dionne, Mark Messier, Gordie Howe and Ron Francis -- only Gretzky will have done it in fewer games (711). Lemieux played his 885th game Friday. Dionne is third on the list, having reached 1,700 points in 1,257 games.

Lemieux could take until January to hit 1,700, and he would still do it in four fewer seasons than Dionne.

Lemieux also needed just 17 goals to record his 700th going into Friday's game. He'll become only the fourth player in NHL history to collect 1,700 points and 17 goals.

It's almost hard to put into perspective, after getting used to seeing milestones come and go for Lemieux, what 1,700 points and 700 goals means. But that number -- four -- goes a long way toward understanding. In the history of the NHL, only Gretzky, Howe and Dionne have collected 1,700 points and 700 goals.

According to the NHL, there have been 5,059 players in the league since its inception in 1917-18.

"I think it's an accurate statistic for their greatness that there's just such a huge gap between (them and) the majority of the rest of the league of all-time players," said Carolina Hurricanes coach Paul Maurice, who saw Lemieux's 1,697th point Wednesday. "There's a lot of really good players who get good points, but who never have to play against the other team's best all night, every night, in every game, at home and on the road. There's not a lot of players who you create a game plan for. But when those guys are on the ice, you have to have a special idea of who you want out there and how you're going to play against them. So, they've been able to generate that kind of offense under great defensive scrutiny and that's wildly impressive."

And as is always the asterisk with Lemieux milestones, there is the question of "what if."

"You try to put everything in perspective, and you look at his numbers and see the company he's with," Penguins coach Eddie Olczyk said. "But you think about the number of games that he's played, you think about where would it be• If he would have played another 300 games, holy cow. Where would he be?"

It's a question Penguins general manager Craig Patrick won't entertain.

"It is what it is," he said.

But Patrick doesn't have to ask. He knows.

"I think he would have reached it a long time ago if he was healthy," Patrick said. "In my eyes, after watching him all these years and having the benefit of growing up watching so many other people that are Hall of Famers, to me, he's the greatest player I've ever seen. It's too bad that he couldn't play healthy all the time, because he'd be up there with Wayne Gretzky."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me