ShareThis Page
Penguins

Crosby's arrival will mirror LeBron's in Cleveland

| Saturday, July 30, 2005

OTTAWA -- The rebuilding Cleveland Cavaliers had one of the worst records and the lowest attendance in the NBA in 2003, the year they won the draft lottery and the chance to select a teenager labeled one of game's next greats.

Sound familiar?

It was a little more than a week ago that the Penguins' ball was picked first from the bin, giving them the right to draft 17-year-old forward Sidney Crosby, who's been compared to a seemingly growing number of hockey greats. The draft begins at noon today.

A glimpse into his immediate impact on the team was evident in the 24 hours following the lottery announcement, as telephones lit up in the team's ticket office and media from across Crosby's native Canada showed up for a news conference at Mellon Arena.

Cavaliers president and Pittsburgh native Len Komoroski, who used his team's first pick to draft LeBron James in 2003, knows the scenario well.

"When we won the lottery, it was as if we had won a championship in terms of our market," he said. "There was incredible excitement."

James was on the roster that fall, and the Cavaliers saw their average attendance rocket from 11,497 in 2002-03 to 18,288 in 2003-04. Komoroski said it was the largest one-year attendance turnaround in the history of the NBA.

"Even this past season, it went up again to 19,128, so, overall, attendance has continued to grow," Komoroski said.

And that's not all.

Komaroski said that television ratings went up 300 percent in the first year, and the number of Cavaliers games televised nationally went from zero to 16, more than the previous decade combined. Last season, the Cavaliers appeared on national television 31 times.

The Cavaliers were fourth overall in NBA merchandise sales last year, with James' jersey topping sales across the league.

And, in addition to increased local and national media, the Cavaliers had journalists from 22 different countries including Malaysia, Brazil and Germany covering the James story his first year in the league.

"It's given us a chance to re-energize our fan base and breed a whole new generation of Cavalier fans," Komoroski said. "Unfortunately, what the Penguins have that we don't is the type of success they've had in their past. We have yet to be in the NBA Finals, let alone win one, so we look at this as really entering the golden era for the Cavaliers."

Komoroski said there were obvious concerns within the organization about how to promote James without putting too much pressure on one teenager. The media spotlight would be on James in any case, but the marketing staff tried to focus its efforts on James within the context of the team.

"People are excited about LeBron, but at the end of the day, they want to see the team do well and win," Komoroski said. "At the end of the day, there has to be substance there. If we aren't making strides to becoming a championship team, that wouldn't resonate with fans nearly as much."

The same year the Cavaliers drafted James, the Penguins selected first overall after trading up to draft goaltender Marc-Andre Fleury. He said the experience was "pretty crazy."

"When you look at it, it was a great time," he said. "It's such a great experience just to be drafted."

Fleury said that although he had recognition at the time, "Sidney has been talked about for so long so he might be a little more busy than I was."

As for advice?

"I don't know. I think maybe not think too much about it," Fleury said. "It's great for that day, but after that you have to move on and go to training camp ready and make the team."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me