ShareThis Page

Another comeback, but this one dooms Pens

| Sunday, Oct. 30, 2005

Two nights after the Penguins' nine-game winless streak came to an end with a stunning comeback, there was yet another comeback at Mellon Arena.

Only, it wasn't the Penguins doing it.

This time, they were on the side that watched its lead evaporate as the Carolina Hurricanes scored four third-period goals, including two on the power play, for a 5-3 victory Saturday night.

And the Penguins, now at 1-5-5 on the season, are right back where they were before Thursday night's win with a day off today and a five-game road trip stretching out directly ahead of them.

"The team was playing so well, it's shocking," said goaltender Sebastien Caron, who faced 18 shots in the third period, four more shots than in the first two combined. "It's like you don't know what to do. Next thing you know, you back up and they score two goals, three goals. It's so awful."

The Penguins led, 3-1, going into the third period after scoring three consecutive goals between John LeClair's tally at 14:06 of the first to tie it, a 5-on-3 power play goal from Sergei Gonchar to take the lead at 2:06 of the second, and an unassisted number by Ziggy Palffy at 8:24.

Shots were 24-9 in favor of the Penguins after two periods. They'd killed 4-of-5 penalties and were 1-for-5 on the advantage.

But all that changed in the third.

A tripping penalty on Mark Recchi at 9:53 of the third, followed by a hooking call on Ryan Malone a minute later, gave the Hurricanes a 5-on-3 advantage. The Penguins killed Recchi's penalty, but Malone was still in the box when Rod Brind'amour tapped one in from the corner to bring the Hurricanes to within one at 12:24.

Glen Wesley tied a little more than a minute later at even strength, with a shot from the point that was reviewed but stood. Then, at 16:14, Sidney Crosby was called for interference. Thirty seconds later, Ray Whitney slipped a rebound between Caron's legs to give the Hurricanes the lead, and Justin Williams scored an empty-netter at the end.

"We got a 5-on-3, and did a pretty good job there. But, then, the 5-on-4, I have to get the puck out there," Recchi said. "It was 3-2, we were still in the driver's seat. But that's the stuff we have to do. After that, we really sat back on our heels, and we didn't really play after that. It was really a lesson for us. You can't sit back against teams. You have to make sure you keep pressing and keep forechecking."

The Hurricanes were coming off a come-from-behind victory, scoring five goals in the third period the night before at home against the Philadelphia Flyers.

"We didn't seem to have our legs under us for 40 minutes," Hurricanes coach Peter Laviolette said. "(Friday night) was pretty emotional, and we were feeling the effects of that a little bit. We had four games in six nights, and travel, and the emotion that comes back from coming back so many times. We knew that if we could score one, that there's a chance that we could pick up a little bit of momentum. We played a pretty good third period."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me