ShareThis Page
Penguins

Game 2: First period roundup

Kevin Gorman
| Tuesday, May 27, 2008

The Penguins were immediately put on the defensive, as goaltender Marc-Andre Fleury faced a barrage of shots while his forwards generated nothing resembling an offensive attack.

Detroit defenseman Brad Stuart scored his first goal of the playoffs, ripping a slap shot from the top of the right circle past defenseman Hal Gill that ricocheted off Fleury's stick and into the net for a 1-0 lead at 6:55.

Left wing Tomas Holmstrom lifted the Red Wings to a 2-0 lead at 11:18 when he zipped a pass from behind the net to Henrik Zetterberg, then tapped in Zetterberg's shot as it slipped between Fleury's pads just before it crossed the goal line.

HIGHLIGHT: Sidney Crosby tried to get the Penguins going early with spirited play, and his blind pass with his back to the net was perfectly placed for his new linemate, left wing Ryan Malone.

LOWLIGHT: Malone whiffed on Crosby's pass right in front of the net, and that swing-and-miss was the closest thing the Penguins had to a shot on goal in the first 12 minutes.

GOALS: 1. Detroit, Brad Stuart (Valtteri Filppula), 6:55; 2. Detroit, Tomas Holmstrom (Henrik Zetterberg), 11:18;

SHOTS: Red Wings 12, Penguins 6

KEY STAT: Defensemen Gill and Rob Scuderi were on the ice for three of Detroit's first five goals of the series.

PENALTIES: Brad Stuart, Detroit (tripping), 11:33; Malone, Penguins (interference), 15:14; Dan Cleary, Detroit (hooking), 17:49; Gary Roberts, Penguins (roughing), 19:46.

POWER PLAYS: Penguins 0-2; Red Wings 0-2.

BEST HIT: Red Wings defenseman Niklas Kronwall landed one of his trademark flying shoulders onto the chin of Penguins left wing Jarkko Ruutu as he crossed the blue line.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me