ShareThis Page

Crosby's playing time an issue

| Monday, June 2, 2008

Burning question: Is captain Sidney Crosby playing enough for the Penguins?

Breakdown: He skated 25 shifts and totaled 22 minutes, 39 seconds of ice-time Saturday in Game 4. He had played no more than 21:01 in the Cup final, and his average ice-time in the Penguins' previous 17 postseason games was 19:43.

PuckSpeak: "Crosby can't play 26, 27, 28 minutes. If he doesn't kill penalties, there's no player that can play 26 or 25. ... But we'll find a way to give quality ice time to Sid. That's our responsibility." - Penguins coach Michel Therrien

Looking ahead: Crosby is not a regular penalty-killer for the Penguins. Therrien used Crosby toward the end of penalty-kill situations prior to his right high-ankle sprain injury but has backed off since Crosby's late-season return - perhaps to keep that ankle from harm's way of shots.

Outside criticism is nothing new to Therrien. His approach with Crosby drew mixed opinions by NBC commentators Pierre McGuire and Eddie Olczyk during Game 4. A recap of their third-period exchange, when the Penguins trailed, 2-1, with 13 minutes remaining:

McGuire: "Sidney Crosby's only played 15 minutes in this game. They've got to find a way to get his ice-time up. Edzo, one of those ways, get him on the ice for penalty kills. You can't have him getting cold on the bench. His time is now. He's ready to do this. He's gotta play more."

Olczyk: "I disagree with you, Pierre. He hasn't really killed penalties all season long; bits and pieces at the end. Maybe if you're down by a couple of goals but not at this juncture right now."

McGuire eventually drew the last word: "You leave a Ferrari in the box, it isn't going to run very hard. You get it out on the highway, it's to take off and go."

- By Rob Rossi

Additional Information:

Gigapan Interactive

Click here to view a Gigapan of the Pens rally at Fifth Avenue Place

Click here to learn about Gigapans.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me