ShareThis Page
Penguins

Christensen enjoying season with Rangers

| Saturday, Feb. 13, 2010

A familiar face was in the Rangers' lineup Friday at Mellon Arena. Erik Christensen, the shootout specialist who was involved in the 2008 trade involving Marian Hossa, has played on Broadway most of the season.

While he only had scored three goals in 27 games entering last night's action, Christensen has enjoyed his best defensive season. A minus player in each of his first four seasons, Christensen is a plus-5 despite playing for the offensively deficient Rangers.

"I'm happy to be here," Christensen said. "It's gone pretty well so far."

Christensen, who scored 18 goals during the 2006-07 season with the Penguins, can sympathize with his new team's recent struggles against the Stanley Cup champions. The Penguins entered last night's game on a seven-game winning streak against the Rangers.

"I know a thing or two about how good things Penguins are," Christensen said. "Playing at Mellon Arena is never easy for the visiting team."

» Rangers star Marian Gaborik decided to play against the Penguins four days after sustaining a cut to his leg courtesy of goalie Henrik Lundqvist's skates during practice. Gaborik participated in the morning and pregame skates, looking uncomfortable on both occasions. Gaborik left in the second period and did not return.

» Penguins coach Dan Bylsma decided to give backup goalie Brent Johnson a start against the Rangers, even though Marc-Andre Fleury's numbers at home against New York are stellar. In his career, Fleury is 12-2-2 at Mellon Arena against the Rangers.

» The Penguins entered Friday's game having won seven straight at home against the Rangers, outscoring New York, 31-11, in that span.

» While the Penguins didn't make any deals in the day before the Olympics, the Rangers were active, acquiring San Jose enforcer Jody Shelley for a conditional draft pick.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me