ShareThis Page

Penguins' Fedotenko could get playoff hook

| Friday, April 16, 2010

One of Dan Bylsma's nicknames is "Disco," but perhaps "Captain Hook" best suits the Penguins coach.

The defending Stanley Cup champions are down 1-0 in their best-of-seven series against the Ottawa Senators. They face a crucial Game 2 on Friday night at Mellon Arena, and Bylsma appears ready to yank a healthy regular wing from the lineup for the second consecutive postseason.

If Ruslan Fedotenko is the new Petr Sykora, then Bylsma will have made an early move that should sound an alarm for any Penguins player whom the coach deems isn't prepared to play in the playoff pressure cooker.

Any forward not named Sidney Crosby, Evgeni Malkin or Jordan Staal is subject to sitting.

"You have to know your message, be real clear, get it to the right people the right way — and you have to be able to re-enforce it as well," Bylsma said Thursday after practice at the Igloo.

Scratching Fedotenko, who scored seven of his 20 career playoff goals last spring for the Penguins, would re-enforce that the Penguins need to perform with more efficiency, patience and determination in the offensive zone.

Fedotenko was not a regular on line rushes during practice Thursday. Pascal Dupuis and Alexei Ponikarovsky worked the wings on Malkin's line, and Fedotenko worked off-rushes with wing Eric Godard, who did not dress for any playoff games last spring.

Game-time decisions are a way of life in the playoffs for NHL coaches, but Bylsma did not dismiss the likelihood of forward Mike Rupp replacing Fedotenko for Game 2. In fact, he suggested Rupp's often nasty style could work as a nice deterrent against a Senators club that Penguins defenseman Brooks Orpik said made Game 1 "not very fun" because of their willing physicality.

"As defensemen, when you (go) back for pucks and you're constantly getting hit ... that wears you down in a hurry in a seven-game series," Orpik said.

Rupp was a healthy scratch in the Penguins' 5-4 loss. He said he would cherish a chance to provide pause to Ottawa's hard-charging third- and fourth-line forwards, who are set on pounding the Penguins' puck-moving defense corps into submission.

"I've made it pretty evident what I do every night — chip pucks in, try to establish the forecheck. There's nothing cute coming from my end," Rupp said. "If I get the opportunity, I'm just going to try and help the team establish some offensive-zone time and move some bodies around."

Added Bylsma: "There's a physical aspect, and when you talk about what Mike has brought to our team and can bring to our team ... he's created offense, zone time, big hits, being that guy with speed through the neutral zone and being a guy who's a crashing, big body."

Bylsma's brief history as coach includes a gut-check benching of Sykora during the second round of last year's playoffs. Sykora had been center Evgeni Malkin's regular right wing for two seasons. But with the Penguins down, 2-0, to Washington in the second round and Malkin needing a spark, Bylsma scratched Sykora, who did not return until Game 6 of the Cup Final.

Sykora and Bylsma were teammates with Anaheim, so there is little reason to believe Bylsma would develop cold feet about sitting Fedotenko, who struggled in the regular season. He had only 11 goals but owns a reputation as a playoff performer.

Fedotenko played less than 11 minutes in Game 1. He did not register a shot, though he was credited with five hits.

Ponikarovsky was no more impressive with only two hits and just a shot. That was his first playoff game since 2004, though he offered no excuses for a disappointing postseason debut with the Penguins.

"You should be able to get into it quicker than I did — especially physically," he said. "It's hard to say that I've never been in this situation because I haven't been in the playoffs in (six) years. ... I don't think it takes any time to prepare yourself emotionally and mentally to play in the playoffs."

If he isn't prepared for Game 2, perhaps Ponikarovsky will be Captain Hook's next victim.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me