ShareThis Page
Penguins

Penguins' Engelland waits to hear from NHL

| Thursday, Dec. 22, 2011

Penguins defenseman Deryk Engelland will learn today whether he remains eligible to play Friday night in Winnipeg.

Engelland faces a telephone hearing with NHL disciplinarian chief Brendan Shanahan for a questionable hit Tuesday on Chicago's Marcus Kruger. Friday's game marks the Penguins' final contest before the Christmas break.

Engelland hit Kruger midway through the first period, and the Chicago defenseman did not return. Kruger and right wing Pascal Dupuis were engaged an instant before the hard-charging Engelland leveled Kruger into the boards.

Engelland's forearm made contact with Kruger's head, which could be construed as a violation of Rule 48. Engelland has no history of dirty play.

> > Defenseman Paul Martin is "day-to-day," Penguins coach Dan Bylsma said. The team has not provided specifics of the injury Martin suffered during the third period in Ottawa on Friday. Martin has not practiced since the injury and has missed two games. No updates were given on center Sidney Crosby (headaches) and defensemen Kris Letang (concussion) and Zbynek Michalek (concussion).

> > Left wing Eric Tangradi was sent back to Wilkes-Barre/Scranton (AHL) after being a healthy scratch against the Blackhawks. Tangradi has seen limited minutes in four games with the Penguins this season. He has 10 goals and 10 assists in 24 games with Wilkes-Barre.

• Centers Evgeni Malkin and Jordan Staal were given the day off from practice but are expected to play Friday.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me