ShareThis Page
Penguins

Pens break even in waiver draft

| Saturday, Oct. 5, 2002

The Penguins lost one player, but secured another Friday.

The Washington Capitals picked 23-year-old defenseman Rick Berry from the Penguins unprotected list in the waiver draft on the same day the Penguins signed winger Alexandre Daigle to a one-year contract.

"I had my goals set higher for being here," said Berry, who was acquired from Colorado last season in the Darius Kasparaitis trade. "It was a surprise to be let go like that. On the other hand, another door opens. It's a brand-new opportunity and a clean slate in Washington."

Daigle has shown promise during the preseason as the Penguins second-leading scorer with three goals and three assists. The 27-year-old was invited to training camp on a tryout contract and immediately showed the speed and soft hands that made him the No. 1 overall pick of the Ottawa Senators in 1993.

Daigle's contract is a $700,000 base salary with incentives that could push it $1.1 million. He hasn't played in the NHL since the 1999-2000 season.

Berry had no clear reason for being left unprotected.

"I've thought about that for days now, I can't come to a conclusion," Berry said. "Maybe they want their veteran guys, I don't know. I'm not the management, I don't make those decisions. I come and work hard and play hockey."

Berry might have made a good impression on the Capitals on Wednesday in the Penguins' 3-1 preseason loss to Washington.

"Maybe they saw a side of me that shows that I'm not scared of anyone," Berry said. "I ended up out there against their top lines and I had to play hard against them and, hopefully, that's what they liked."

The Penguins had the fifth pick in the waiver draft, but did not make a selection. Only six players changed teams.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me