ShareThis Page
Sports

Smoltz tired of talking about his shoulder

| Wednesday, Oct. 5, 2005

ATLANTA -- John Smoltz slipped out of the Atlanta Braves' clubhouse through a side door, hoping to avoid reporters camped out by his locker. He knew what was coming and, frankly, he was a little tired of talking about it.

Smoltz walked all the way to the parking lot before finally -- with more than a little reluctance -- he stopped by his car to chat.

"Everybody's putting me in a coffin," Smoltz said. "All I've got is a stiff shoulder. It's not that big a deal."

The Braves made it official Tuesday, announcing that Smoltz will pitch Game 2 of the NL division series against the Houston Astros instead of the opener. Tim Hudson will go in Game 1 today against Andy Pettitte.

Manager Bobby Cox waited until the Braves were traveling home from their final regular-season game before revealing his plans to those involved. He called it a precautionary move, giving the team some flexibility in case Smoltz's shoulder acts up again.

"John is not 100 percent. But if he's 95 percent, that's good enough," Cox said. "He is feeling good. He's thrown a lot in between this time (since his last start). He doesn't really ache or anything like that. It's just a matter of locating his fastball a little bit better."

Still, it was big news when the Braves passed over Smoltz for Game 1 in the best-of-five series. After all, he's the winningest pitcher in postseason history with a 14-4 record. He wanted to get back in the rotation to start games such as this, feeling he didn't have as much impact during the last four postseasons as a closer.

But the wear-and-tear of pitching a team-high 2292/3 innings apparently got to Smoltz late in the season. He pushed back one start a couple of days, then sat out the last nine days of the regular season to rest for the playoffs.

Even though Smoltz (14-7) felt better during a bullpen session Sunday, Cox wanted some assurance that his opening-day pitcher could come back on three days' rest for Game 4, if necessary.

Hudson (14-9) was a pretty good backup choice, having pitched in four division series for Oakland.

"I'm not exactly chopped liver," he said. "I don't feel like their settling for me going in the first game. It really doesn't matter who goes first and who goes second."

While Hudson's postseason resume -- 1-2 with a 3.44 ERA in six starts -- hardly matches up to Smoltz's numbers, the Braves have plenty of confidence in the 30-year-old right-hander.

"To me, it's just another bullet in our belt," second baseman Marcus Giles said. "We have just as much confidence in Huddy as we do in John. Huddy has pitched in a lot of big games. I don't look at this as a bad situation.

"And if we get Game 1 under our belt," Giles added, "look who we've got going in Game 2."

Well, look who the Astros have going in Game 1. And Game 2. And don't forget Game 3.

Pettitte (17-9) has 13 postseason wins -- trailing only Smoltz -- and put up an ERA of 2.39 this season, which was second in the National League to ... teammate Roger Clemens (13-8, 1.87), the future Hall of Famer who will oppose Smoltz on Thursday.

Houston's rotation is so strong that Roy Oswalt (20-12, 2.94) won't go until Saturday, when the series shifts to Texas, despite his second straight 20-win season and the NL's seventh-best ERA.

"Coming out with Pettitte, Clemens and Oswalt, you've got to feel pretty good about it," manager Phil Garner said. "If I had one other guy to add to this rotation, it would be Cy Young. It would be hard to get him here now, I guess. But, nonetheless, I feel pretty good about it."

The Astros' offense is another story. Houston finished 13th in the NL with a .256 batting average and 11th in runs (just under 4.3 per game).

"Hopefully," said Morgan Ensberg, whose 101 RBI were 19 more than anyone else on the team, "the rules of baseball that have applied for a hundred years -- pitching and defense wins games -- will carry over here."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me