ShareThis Page
Pirates

Notebook: Duke hasn't signed offer

| Saturday, Feb. 25, 2006

Left-handed pitcher Zach Duke still has not signed the one-year contract worth $335,000 offered to him the by the Pirates. Duke, 22, has less than three years of major-league experience and thus has no leverage with the Pirates because he does not yet qualify for salary arbitration. Duke seemed bemused by the news value of the story, especially considering there's nothing he can do about the situation.

"It's not really that big of a deal and I'm not really upset about it," he said.

  • Six pitchers threw either bullpen sessions or live batting practice Friday, including left-hander Sean Burnett, who is in contention for the No. 5 spot in the Pirates' starting rotation. Burnett, 23, missed all of 2005 after undergoing two surgeries on his throwing arm. The other pitchers who threw yesterday were right-handers Matt Capps, Roberto Hernandez, Matt Peterson and Ron Chiavacci and left-hander Mike Johnston. Manager Jim Tracy said that more pitchers would likely throw either batting practice or a bullpen session today.

  • Third baseman Joe Randa, signed during the offseason as a free agent, is wearing No. 5 in his second stint with the Pirates. When he played for Pittsburgh in 1997, Randa wore No. 16, but is wearing No. 5 this year in honor of Hall-of-Famer George Brett, with whom Randa grew close while playing in Kansas City from 1999-2004.

  • TribLIVE commenting policy

    You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

    We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

    While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

    We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

    We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

    We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

    We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

    We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

    click me