ShareThis Page
Pirates

Knockout comes quickly

| Thursday, July 6, 2006

NEW YORK -- The upcoming All-Star festivities will cast Pittsburgh in such a positive light that, perhaps, nobody will notice the Pirates' dismal record, which stands at 29-57 following a 5-0 loss to the Mets on Wednesday.

Truth is, though, that record has most of the Pirates looking forward to the break that will accompany the Midsummer Classic.

Kip Wells likely needs it more than any of his teammates.

Wells lost his fourth game of the season last night.

He has now dropped 13 decisions since the 2005 All-Star Game. He has won just two of 18 starts over the past year. His ERA over that span stands at 7.35.

Wells' next start won't come until after the All-Star break.

A few days away from baseball might do Wells a world of good. Maybe then he could put those frightful 360-some days behind him.

"It's been kind of a whirlwind. ... Obviously, I'm going to take advantage of it from a regrouping standpoint," Wells said. "It'll be a chance to catch my breath and hopefully come back as a more productive pitcher."

It might help, too, if his offense could get him some runs.

New York starter Orlando Hernandez didn't allow any last night.

The Pirates managed only four hits on his 107 pitches over seven innings. Conversely, they struck out seven times against him. Only Jose Bautista, Jose Castillo, Sean Casey and Ronny Paulino managed to ding Hernandez. The Pirates failed miserably to damage a pitcher who entered last night with a 4-8 record and a 5.55 ERA.

So much for the offense that scored six or more runs in six consecutive games for the first time since September 2000, the offense that had banged out at least 10 hits in seven straight contests.

"We weren't able to string together anything," manager Jim Tracy said. "Give credit to (Hernandez). He was on his game."

Wells has been felled in every start since returning from vascular surgery on his right throwing arm. The procedure corrected a circulatory condition diagnosed during the early part of spring training.

Back then, in late February, Wells was seemingly making marked progress with pitching coach Jim Colborn, who was convinced the 29-year-old was better than his 8-18 record from 2005 suggested.

For much of last night, Wells actually was the pitcher Colborn had envisioned.

He allowed no hits and only two baserunners in the second through sixth innings. In working six, Wells made his longest start of the season.

Despite allowing five runs, his ERA was lowered to 12.42 from 15.19.

The Mets posted all five of their runs on all four of their hits before Wells recorded a third out in the first inning.

Tracy said Wells was up in the zone in the first, after which, his sinker began to dip.

"I was able to establish my off-speed stuff from the second inning on, and that helped me get some quick outs," Wells said. "I just couldn't weather the storm in the first. Then it became a soul-searching kind of deal for me to get some quality innings in after that."

He did that, and he was able to take a positive from yet another loss.

"Fortunately, I was able to put together some good innings after the first, so that's something for me to build on in the second half of the season," Wells said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me