ShareThis Page
Pirates

Pirates farm report

| Tuesday, Aug. 29, 2006

A look at how the Pirates' farm teams fared in games played Monday:

INDIANAPOLIS (Triple-A, 73-63) had its game at Richmond (Braves) suspended because of rain, with Richmond leading, 3-1, in the top of the third inning.

ALTOONA (Double-A, 74-59) won, 5-3, at home against Akron (Indians). Right-handed starter Landon Jacobsen (14-8) allowed two earned runs on seven hits over 8 1/3 innings. Center fielder Andrew McCutchen went 2 for 3 with three RBI. Second baseman Javier Guzman went 2 for 3 with an RBI and two runs scored.

LYNCHBURG (High Single-A, 25-38 second half) won, 5-1, at home against Wilmington (Red Sox). Right-handed starter Matt Lorenzo (2-4) allowed no runs on four hits over seven innings. First baseman Steven Pearce went 2 for 3 with a solo home run and two RBI. Center fielder Pedro Powell went 1 for 3 with two runs scored.

HICKORY (Low Single-A, 31-32 second half) had the day off.

WILLIAMSPORT (Single-A short season, 26-39) won, 10-0, at Batavia (Phillies). Right-handed starter Patrick Bresnahan (4-5) allowed no runs on three hits and struck out eight over six innings. Left fielder Alexander Presley went 2 for 5 with a solo home run and two RBI. Center fielder James Barksdale went 3 for 6 with two runs scored.

BRADENTON (Rookie, 27-26) has completed its season.

Additional Information:

Complete coverage

Top AP Sports
NFL Team-by-Team
NFL Game Stories
MLB | NHL
NASCAR | Tennis
College Football
Sports Gallery
News | Living
Top Business

    Baseball Stories

    Top Sports Stories

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me