ShareThis Page

Baseball union, owners close to deal on drug policy

| Thursday, March 27, 2008

NEW YORK -- Lawyers for baseball players and owners were close to an agreement Wednesday on changes to toughen their drug rules, and the sides hoped to strike a deal by Sunday.

An agreement likely would lead to the elimination of 15-day suspensions imposed in December on Kansas City's Jose Guillen and Baltimore's Jay Gibbons after they were linked to performance-enhancing drugs.

Negotiators discussed changes this week in Arizona and neared a deal, two people familiar with the talks said Wednesday, speaking on condition of anonymity because talks were ongoing. The agreement would make testing tougher and strengthen the authority of the independent program administrator.

Lawyers were awaiting the return from Japan of officials who attended the season-opening series between Boston and Oakland. The sides hoped to complete talks before Sunday, when the U.S. portion of the season opens with Washington hosting Atlanta at the Nationals' new ballpark.

Players and owners would be toughening drug rules for the third time since their initial agreement in August 2002. The sides also made changes in January 2005, when sanctions for first offenders were instituted, and in November 2005, when the penalty for an initial positive test was increased from 10 days to 50 games.

In his Dec. 13 report on drugs in baseball, former Senate majority leader George Mitchell recommended commissioner Bud Selig not punish players implicated by his investigation "except in those cases where he determines that the conduct is so serious that discipline is necessary to maintain the integrity of the game."

Guillen and Gibbons were suspended Dec. 6. The San Francisco Chronicle reported in November that Guillen bought human growth hormone, two types of testosterone and the steroids from 2002-05, allegations the Kansas City outfielder wouldn't address.

Gibbons admitted receiving an HGH shipment in January 2005. The Baltimore outfielder apologized and didn't contest the penalty.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me