ShareThis Page
Pirates

Capps, Nationals finalize one-year contract

| Thursday, Jan. 7, 2010

WASHINGTON — Reliever Matt Capps and the Washington Nationals finalized their $3.5 million, one-year contract Wednesday. The 26-year-old right-hander became a free agent last month when the Pirates declined to offer a contract for 2010. He was 4-8 with a 5.80 ERA and 27 saves in 32 chances last season, striking out 46 in 54.1 innings. Capps can earn an additional $425,000 in performance bonuses for games finished under the deal.

» A person familiar with the negotiations says Eric Hinske and the Atlanta Braves have reached a preliminary agreement on a one-year contract. The 32-year-old is expected to play behind newly signed first baseman Troy Glaus and third baseman Chipper Jones. He also can play the corner outfield spots and is expected to be the team's top left-handed pinch-hitter. Hinske hit .242 with eight homers and 25 RBI for Pirates and the New York Yankees last season.

» Right-hander Clay Condrey and the Minnesota Twins agreed to terms on a one-year, free-agent contract. The 34-year-old became a free agent after pitching four seasons for Philadelphia, going 6-2 with a 3.00 ERA in 42 innings last year for the NL champions. The Twins also released right-handed reliever Bobby Keppel.

» The Boston Red Sox are realigning their outfield by shifting center fielder Jacoby Ellsbury to left to make room for Mike Cameron. The decision was made after they signed Cameron, a three-time Gold Glove winner, last month. In his 1,829 games, Cameron has played center field in 1,699 and left field in just three.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me