ShareThis Page
Pirates

D. McCutchen on comeback trail

| Sunday, June 20, 2010

INDIANAPOLIS - Daniel McCutchen, who opened the 2010 season in the Pirates' starting rotation but was demoted after allowing 18 runs in 12 innings, is desperate to get back to Pittsburgh.

He struggled through a rough May in Triple-A Indianapolis, going 1-3 with a 5.60 ERA in five starts, allowing 35 hits in 27.1 innings. However in his past two starts, McCutchen has shown why hopes were high for him entering this season. The right-hander has thrown back-to-back solid seven-inning outings, giving up just six hits and three runs combined.

"My body feels a lot better," said McCutchen, 27. "I hit a bit of a rough patch, but now I'm throwing four pitches for strikes, and my velocity is up. I'm staying positive, getting my work in and just hoping for that call-up. It's Triple-A. You go out there do your job and hope that's enough."

Ex-Pitt star gets hot

Second baseman Jim Negrych certainly isn't wasting any time adjusting to Triple-A after a June 11 call-up from Double-A Altoona.

The University of Pittsburgh product has eight hits in in 17 at-bats (.471 average), and on Thursday provided the only runs in a 2-0 win over Buffalo with a two-run home run.

In 49 games with Altoona, the 25-year old hit one home run. In just six games at Indianapolis, Negrych already has two homers. A sixth round pick in 2006, Negrych has shown a keen eye at the plate, striking out just 29 times in 152 at-bats, while collecting 22 walks.

On The Rise

With Pedro Alvarez's promotion to to the parent club, left fielder Quincy Latimore assumes the RBI lead in the Pirates' farm system with 52. A fourth-round pick in 2007, Latimore, 21, has seven home runs and also leads the Single-A Florida State League in RBI. However, developing plate discipline is still a work in progress. In 61 games this year, Latimore has struck out 68 times.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me