ShareThis Page

Galvan will serve as Spadafora's next opponent

| Thursday, April 15, 2004

Ruben Galvan is not a household name in boxing, but the junior welterweight met a different criteria to become the opponent for Paul Spadafora's ring return.

"I needed a Hispanic fighter," Spadafora promoter Michael Acri said, "and I got one."

Galvan (20-4-2, 9 KOs), a native of Mexico who now lives in Hammond, Ind., will face Spadafora (36-0-1, 14 KOs) on April 29 at the Hilton Garden Inn at Southpointe.

Spadafora, a former lightweight champion, hasn't fought since his controversial draw against Leonard Dorin last May in a unification bout at Petersen Events Center and has since been troubled by legal and substance abuse issues.

The fight is being billed as "Return of the Kid," in reference to Spadafora's "Pittsburgh Kid" tag, but is far from the triumphant return his promoter planned. Spadafora originally was supposed to fight undefeated Floyd Mayweather Jr. at Madison Square Garden in New York before the site and the fight ultimately fell through.

With Spadafora receiving a set purse and only 1,500 seats available at the hotel, Acri said he sought a Hispanic boxer to sell to the Latin American television audience.

Galvan has won eight of his past 10 fights, his most recent a 10-round unanimous decision over Ryan Maraldo last month in Tunica, Miss.

"He's probably the fastest kid Paul's fought, hand speed-wise," Acri said. "He's not the perfect style for Paul, because he's fast. He's an active fighter and Paul's been off a year."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me