ShareThis Page

Notebook: Former MVP lands in jail

| Wednesday, Sept. 15, 2004

Former NL Most Valuable Player Ken Caminiti has failed four drug tests since going on probation in 2002 for possession of cocaine, including one last week that landed him in jail, his probation officer said Tuesday.

Caminiti remained in the Harris County jail yesterday after his private meeting with probation officer Tracy Burns. She has handled his case since he was sentenced to three years' deferred adjudication probation after his 2001 arrest in a Houston motel room. Caminiti told a magazine he was using performance-enhancing drugs when he won the 1996 MVP award as a member of the San Diego Padres.

  • Jason Giambi returned to the Yankees' lineup last night for the first time since July 23 and was in the No. 6 slot in the batting order for New York's game against Kansas City. New York manager Joe Torre said his plan was to use Giambi strictly as a designated hitter. With the Clippers' elimination in the International League playoffs, all of the Yankees' farm teams have completed their seasons, so the major league team was the only place to get Giambi game time.

  • Manager Art Howe met with New York Mets owner Fred Wilpon and general manager Jim Duquette yesterday, one day after saying that if the team planned to fire him, it should do it now. "When something should be announced, it will be announced," Howe said. "Nothing is being disclosed at this time. All I can say is I'm managing tonight. I take it one day at a time. It's not over yet." The Daily News reported on Monday that Mets brass had decided at a weekend meeting to fire Howe at the end of the season. He has two years and $4.7 million remaining on his contract.

  • TribLIVE commenting policy

    You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

    We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

    While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

    We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

    We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

    We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

    We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

    We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

    click me