ShareThis Page

Williams becomes latest backup to start

| Friday, Oct. 22, 2004


That's been a familiar mantra around the Steelers' South Side practice facility as injuries have continued to mount this season.

The next backup-turned-starter will be veteran Willie Williams, who'll take over for Chad Scott at cornerback, when the Steelers host the New England Patriots on Oct. 31.

"I'm just going to step up," Williams said. "The next guy has to be ready to play, whoever's out there. Injuries happen in the NFL every year. The next guy has to be ready to play.

"I've been around for a long time. You see it every year, key guys can go down and the next guy has to be ready to play. It happened to me; I've been there and done that. You're one play away from being out there."

Williams, 33, has started 104 of 173 career games but hasn't been an NFL regular since starting 12 games and appearing in 15 with Seattle in 2002.

He first assumed a starting role as a third-year pro with the Steelers in 1995 after cornerback Deon Figures sustained a gunshot wound in the offseason. The Steelers also lost starting cornerback Rod Woodson (knee) that season.

Williams wound up leading the AFC and finishing third in the NFL with seven interceptions.

The Steelers estimate Scott will be lost for 4-to-6 weeks with a quadriceps-tendon tear.

"Chad Scott's one of our leaders," Williams said. "We're going to miss him."

Williams intends to fill in for Scott in that capacity, as well.

"I'm here to be a leader and to help these young guys out, show them how the game is played and get them ready to take that next step, to go out there and help this team and make some plays," he said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me