ShareThis Page

Notebook: Portugal could be without three starters

| Saturday, July 1, 2006, 12:00 p.m.

Already without two starters for its quarterfinal match against England today, Portugal could be missing a third: creative winger Cristiano Ronaldo. The Portuguese have lost playmaker Deco and defender Costinha to suspension after they received red cards Sunday against the Netherlands. And a thigh injury to Ronaldo could force coach Luiz Felipe Scolari into deeper tactical changes.

• Police briefly intervened yesterday when England and Germany soccer fans confronted each other on an otherwise peaceful evening.

Despite a generally easygoing atmosphere, police arrested several fans for throwing bottles and isolated fights. In all, 30 people were arrested -- 10 Germans and 20 English fans in town a day before their team's quarterfinal match against Portugal -- Gelsenkirchen Police spokesman Thomas Weise said.

• Brazil defender Lucio enters today's quarterfinal match against France with a chance to surpass the mark for most consecutive minutes played in a World Cup without committing a foul. Lucio has not been called in Brazil's first four matches and is 23 minutes from passing the mark set by Paraguay defender Carlos Gamarra, who in 1998 spent 383 minutes without allowing a free kick.

• Spain coach Luis Aragones said yesterday he will remain in charge, despite a promise to quit if his team was eliminated early from the World Cup. Aragones said he will stay until the European Championships in 2008 after meeting with Spanish soccer federation officials. Additional Information:

World Cup online

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me