ShareThis Page

West Point's Pehrson pitches no-no

| Thursday, July 10, 2008

Hope Pehrson pitched a no-hitter for West Point, as it blanked Apollo, 16-0, in five innings on Wednesday in the first round of the Junior Division of the District 26 Little League softball tournament.

Maria Slezak had a homer and double, and Alyssa Bates had a double and triple for West Point.


Greensburg 7, Elizabeth 6

Greensburg jumped to a 5-0 lead in the second inning and went on to defeat host Elizbeth in the opening game of the Westmoreland Junior Legion best-of-three semifinal playoffs.

Vinny Mongelluzzo and Nick Vottero each hit doubles for Greensburg, which welcomes Elizabeth for the second game at 6 p.m. today at Westmoreland County Community College.

West Point 6, Latrobe 3 (6 inn.)

West Point edged Latrobe in the semifinals of the 12-year old division of the District 26 Little League playoffs.

Latrobe took an early lead on a two-run homer by Zack Zavatasky in the top of the first inning.

West Point responded quickly. Nathan Fleck hit a two-run homer in the bottom of the first.

West Point got the eventual game-winning run in the bottom of the third inning.

West Point advances to the finals at 7:30 p.m. Friday at Latrobe.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me