ShareThis Page
News

Trust in the Steelers' defense

| Sunday, Nov. 2, 2008

Last Sunday night, a die hard Giants fan in New Jersey who is a longtime buddy of mine, called me on the cell. "Dude, I can't believe how good the Steelers defense is! I thought for sure we were going to lose when Brandon Jacobs couldn't get any yardage."

To his delight, the Giants won. As the Steelers visit D.C. tonight hoping the third time is the charm against the NFC East, it is their defense that should have you hopeful, not only tonight, but for the rest of the year. Before yesterday's games, they led the league in allowing the fewest yards per game. They were third in the most important defensive stat, points allowed per game. Even in the two games they have lost, the Steelers have allowed only 36 total points. It wouldn't be a shock if the Steelers lose Monday. But it will surprise me if running back Clinton Portis has a big night. And Jersey Jim would agree.

  • If you want an early indication of how things are going to go tonight, watch what the Steelers do on third down. In their five wins, they convert on third down at better than 42 percent. In their two losses, they are only converting at 13 percent.
  • Nate Washington has come on in recent weeks and has a touchdown catch of 40 or more yards three straight games. Impressed• You should be. The only other player in Steelers history to do that was Jimmy Orr in 1958 when he had a touchdown catch of 40 or more yards in four straight games.
  • With all the talk about fines in the NFL recently, especially those related to Pittsburgh Steelers players, it should be made clear that it is not a good defense that no penalty was called on a play when a player is fined. Before this past weekend, there were more fines levied against players on plays where there was not a penalty than on plays where a penalty was actually called. An infraction is an infraction even if it's only caught later on tape. It just makes you wonder what the officials are watching that so many are missed.
  • As the Penguins muck and grind their way through the early portion of the season, I keep hearing how they started slowly the past two years as well. That they didn't really start playing until Thanksgiving last year. And while that is true, expecting it to happen again is a mistake. There is no guarantee they will be able to turn around what has been a very mediocre start.
  • But with all the theories about what has troubled them to date, none is as pertinent as the roster changes since June. Of the players who dressed for game six when the Red Wings closed out the Stanley Cup finals, six are gone and two others are out with long term injuries. And three guys who didn't dress for that game are no longer on the Pens current roster. That's 11 out of the 24 players gone who were in-and-out of uniform last June fourth. That's a lot of upheaval. It's possible things will click again. Just don't expect it because it happened that way in the past.

  • I'm convinced the Pirates made a mistake when they twice failed to hire Ken Macha to be their manager. Their loss is now the Milwaukee Brewers gain. Macha will take over the Brew Crew with the second best winning percentage (.568) among major league managers since 2000. The only guy better• Joe Torre. Actually it's a good thing for Macha he didn't get that Bucco job. Or that winning percentage surely would have dropped.
  • While it was tough to justify why Upper St. Clair got such a tough opening draw in the WPIAL football playoffs, few seemed to realize that made it unfair for their opponent as well. McKeesport was the third seed and probably deserved an easier first round opponent. But the result was the most exciting Quad-A game of the opening round.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me