ShareThis Page

Infielder Bixler reacquired from Indians

| Tuesday, July 13, 2010

• Infielder Brian Bixler was reacquired from the Cleveland Indians for a player to be named. Bixler, the Pirates' second-round draft pick in 2004, was traded to Cleveland in January for infielder Jesus Brito. Bixler batted .178 for the Pirates spanning the 2008-09 seasons. He struck out 62 times in 152 at-bats. He was batting .278 with three homers and 27 RBI for the Indians' Triple-A Columbus affiliate. Bixler has been assigned to Triple-A Indianapolis.

• Left-hander Jeff Locke was promoted to Double-A Altoona, and right-handed pitcher Tim Alderson was demoted to High-A Bradenton. Locke (9-3, 3.54 ERA for Bradenton) was acquired last year from Atlanta in the Nate McLouth trade. "We felt like we needed to get Alderson off the treadmill of surviving and trying to get (Double-A) hitters out, and shifted to focusing on taking the steps necessary to get on track to getting (major league) hitters out," farm director Kyle Stark said. "This is a big-picture move focused on his delivery, mentality and understanding of who he needs to be as a pitcher." Alderson (7-5, 5.62) was acquired from San Francisco in the Freddy Sanchez trade. Alderson pitched three innings Monday and gave up six runs (five earned) against Richmond. The game was suspended by rain in the fourth inning.

• West Virginia left-hander Nathan Baker was named Single-A South Atlantic League Pitcher of the Week.

• State College right-hander Kevin Decker was named New York-Penn League Pitcher of the Week.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me