ShareThis Page

U.S. Women's Amateur semifinals set

| Saturday, Aug. 14, 2010

CHARLOTTE, N.C. — Danielle Kang defeated Sydnee Michaels on the first hole of a playoff Friday and advanced to the semifinals of the U.S. Women's Amateur.

Kang will face Jennifer Kirby, who beat Kristen Park, 6 and 4. Stephanie Sherlock, a 2 and 1 winner against Junthima Gulyanamitta, will face Jessica Korda, who eliminated Erynne Lee, 4 and 3.

Kang, one of two Americans still in contention, had a chance to close her match in regulation but missed a putt and swung her club in disgust. She nailed the green in two on No. 10 immediately afterward for a much smoother finish.

"Usually, I tell myself not to get angry on the golf course," Kang said. "I try to keep cool all the time, but the last (regulation) hole really got on my nerves. It got to me, really badly, when I three-putted that. That's something you shouldn't do."

On the playoff hole, Michaels missed long into the rough. She then got caught in the long grass on the edge of the green on her next shot.

Kang said her father helped her keep things in perspective after the missed putt.

"I was upset," she said. "But when I came down on the last hole, my dad made the comment to me to pretend that we were going to give them more entertainment. ... That made me happy."

Kirby built an early lead, then coasted against Park, who won the U.S. Girls Junior in 2007. Kirby and Sherlock are attempting to become the first Canadians to win the event since Cathy Sherk in 1978.

"I'm not thinking about that," Kirby said. "With match play, you just have to think about the hole you're on because that's the most important thing. I'm not going to get into the finals if I don't win the holes before that."

The forecast for today's semifinals at Charlotte Country Club calls for muggy but cooler weather in the upper 70s, with a chance of thunderstorms. The final 36 holes are Sunday.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me