ShareThis Page
Steelers

Steelers, Bucs engage in pre-game fracas

Jerry DiPaola
| Tuesday, Dec. 24, 2002

TAMPA, Fla. — The game between the Steelers and Tampa Bay Buccaneers didn't start until 9 p.m. Monday, but that didn't stop players from entering the fray early.

While both teams were warming up about 30 minutes before kickoff, a brief series of pushing and shoving incidents occurred on the Steelers' side of the 50. The main combatants appeared to be backup Buccaneers linebacker Nate Webster and Steelers linebackers James Farrior and Joey Porter. Buccaneers wide receiver Keyshawn Johnson quickly ushered Webster back to his side of the field, and order was restored. There were no further incidents.

Also in warm-ups, Bucs defensive lineman Warren Sapp ran through the Steelers on his way to the Tampa Bay end of the field. Steeler running back Jerome Bettis shoved Sapp, but it went no further than that.

It was the first physical confrontation between the teams since Steelers strong safety Lee Flowers called the Buccaneers “paper champions” after the Steelers' 17-10 victory last year in Tampa.

Flowers refused to apologize for the statement last week, and Buccaneers Pro Bowl defensive tackle Warren Sapp responded by insulting Flowers with a vulgar obscenity.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me