ShareThis Page
Steelers

Notebook: Steelers, grade thyselves

| Tuesday, Dec. 6, 2005

Steelers players and coaches had their weekly meeting Monday with a bit of a "change-up," according to cornerback Ike Taylor.

Each player got out pen and paper and graded his performance from last Sunday's 38-31 loss to the Cincinnati Bengals, who not only pushed the Steelers two games out of first place in the AFC North Division, but extended the Steelers' losing streak to three games.

"We grade ourselves every week, but (Monday) you took the notebook out and graded yourself and gave a plus or minus for each individual play (from) Sunday against the Cincinnati Bengals."

Taylor said teammates then shared their individual grades, as a way of holding themselves accountable for their effort, or lack thereof.

"We have to re-focus," Taylor said. "Everybody had to take a look at himself in the mirror, see what you can do individually to help this team. See what we did in our first nine games (when the Steelers were 7-2) and what we didn't do in our last three games."

The Steelers spent yesterday at the South Side practice facility going through conditioning work and attending meetings.

  • Veteran Steelers RB Jerome Bettis will be featured at 7:30 tonight on "In My Own Words" on Fox Sports Net Pittsburgh.

    "Growing up, it's funny because I didn't play football at all, I was a bowler," Bettis says in the up-close interview. "I have been bowling since I was seven years old. ... That was a way that my mother thought she could keep her two boys out of the street."

  • TribLIVE commenting policy

    You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

    We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

    While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

    We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

    We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

    We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

    We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

    We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

    click me