ShareThis Page

Wednesday's NFL notes: Favre probably to retire as Packer

| Thursday, Sept. 7, 2006

Although Brett Favre says he's "99.9 percent" sure he'll retire as a Green Bay Packer, he can't rule out the possibility he might finish his career with another team.

"I can't say it wouldn't happen," Favre said in an interview with HBO.

• Broncos quarterback Jake Plummer won't face a jury trial in his road rage case.

"The case has been disposed," Englewood Municipal Court administrator Tamara Wolfe said Wednesday.

• Alvis Whitted will start at wide receiver for the Oakland Raiders in their season opener against San Diego, filling the role vacated when Doug Gabriel was traded to New England.

• Carolina Panthers All-Pro receiver Steve Smith has more hamstring trouble and is questionable for Sunday's game against Atlanta. Smith, who missed 17 days of training camp with a strained left hamstring, did not practice yesterday because of pain in his right hamstring.

• A Detroit Lions assistant coach was arrested twice in the past two weeks -- once while police say he was driving nude and a week later on suspicion of drunken driving. Joe Cullen, who coaches the team's defensive line, posted bond in both misdemeanor cases and was coaching at yesterday's practice.

• Without fanfare, the NFL and its officials have reached agreement on a six-year contract extension, avoiding the kind of labor squabble that led to a two-week lockout five years ago.


6 - Weeks that Kansas City Chiefs tackle John Welbourn, who unexpectedly retired in June, was suspended for violating the league's drug policy. Additional Information:

Complete coverage

    NFL Stories
    Top Sports Stories
Section Fronts
Top Sports
NFL Team-by-Team
NFL Game Stories
NASCAR | Tennis
College Football
Sports Gallery
News | Living

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me