ShareThis Page
Steelers

Harris: Tomlin still searching at right tackle

| Sunday, Aug. 22, 2010

EAST RUTHERFORD, N.J. — Mike Tomlin can't be serious. He made long-time left tackle Flozell Adams the Steelers' new savior at right tackle — the same player who's five years on the wrong side of 30 and is playing right tackle for the first time since the 20th century.

Little wonder that Tomlin said he wanted to see Jonathan Scott receive some meaningful playing time during Saturday night's second preseason game against the New York Giants.

You remember Jonathan Scott, don't you• OK, maybe you don't.

Scott has bounced around the NFL like a ping-pong ball. He's now playing for his third team in five seasons. His claim to fame is being joined at the hip with new offensive line coach Sean Kugler, who knows Scott from their time together with the Bills and Lions.

Scott signed a one-year contract in March, as a backup to Willie Colon. That was before Colon wrecked his Achilles and was lost for the season.

Quarterback Byron Leftwich saw his career flash before his eyes last week when Detroit's Cliff Avril ran around Adams on a speed rush and sacked Leftwich quicker than you can say, "Look out!''

That's when the light bulb went on, and I realized why the Dallas Cowboys released Adams even though they are still thin at tackle.

But you know what they say: One team's weakness is another team's strength.

That is, until Tomlin put the brakes on the Adams experiment and re-opened the competition at right tackle to include Scott. Adams started and was on the field for a total of 20 plays against the Giants, before yielding to Scott.

The best thing that can be said about Adams' performance last night is that Ben Roethlisberger remained upright. The Giants pressured Roethlisberger, who was making his preseason debut, but he wasn't under constant duress. Ben didn't suffer bodily harm, although he did throw a long interception on his second series when the right side of the offensive line caved in.

Colon, who has been upbeat despite his non-playing status, was a fixture at St. Vincent College during camp, always quick with a word of advice or encouragement. Colon spoke briefly with Adams last night between the first and second quarters.

To his credit, Colon hasn't complained about never receiving a contract-extension offer, or even the courtesy of a phone call from management telling him they weren't interested in retaining him long-term. Which is funny, or not so funny depending on your point of view, because now everyone is saying Colon was the lynchpin of the offensive line and how the Steelers miss him and need him.

The Steelers are learning the hard way that it's more difficult to replace Colon than they thought it would be. You can tell because of Tomlin's insistence on observing Scott at length against the Giants, even after signing Adams when few teams were lining up for his services because of his age and lack of agility.

Scott replaced Adams when Leftwich took over for Roethlisberger midway through the second quarter. How did he do• It all depends on what the Steelers are looking for. Scott did a decent job protecting his side of the field, particularly on Leftwich's 68-yard touchdown bomb to Mike Wallace, when Leftwich had all day to throw.

Adams is a superior run blocker to Scott, who is eight years younger and quicker but has far less experience and savvy. When Adams get his hands on a defender, that defender is helpless. The question is whether Adams' lack of quickness as a pass blocker is a bigger negative than Scott's lack of experience. The choice belongs to Tomlin, who didn't see anything last night from Adams and Scott he hasn't seen before.

Photo Galleries

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me